Skip to content

ADR-NNN: [Decision Title]

  • Status: Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded
  • Date: YYYY-MM-DD
  • Authors: [Author names]
  • Related RFCs: RFC-XXX (The origin of this decision)
  • Related PRDs: PRD-XXX

Context & Problem Statement

[Describe the context and the problem that required an architectural decision. What were the constraints and requirements?]

Decision

[State the specific architectural decision clearly and concisely.]

Rationale

[Explain why this decision was made. What were the key factors, trade-offs, and alternatives considered?]

Alternatives Considered

[List the alternatives that were rejected and why.]

  1. [Alternative 1]: [Description and why it was rejected]
  2. [Alternative 2]: [Description and why it was rejected]

Consequences

[Describe the impact of this decision on the architecture, development process, and future features.]

  • Positive: [e.g., Improved modularity, better performance]
  • Negative: [e.g., Increased complexity, new dependency]
  • Neutral: [e.g., Requires one-time migration]

Implementation Notes

[Briefly mention where this decision is implemented in the codebase or how it affects implementation.]

  • Module: podcast_scraper/[module]
  • Pattern: [e.g., Factory Pattern, Protocol-based interface]

References